The silver and gold markets are entering a decisive new phase—one defined less by headline prices and more by physical supply, geopolitical competition, and the slow breakdown of the old dollar-centric system. In a wide-ranging interview with precious metals analyst Rob Kientz, a clear message emerges: the traditional way investors understand gold and silver prices is no longer sufficient. What matters now is availability, control of resources, and who ultimately sets the rules of trade.
Silver’s move through the long-watched $50 level marked more than a psychological milestone. For decades, silver approached this level only to reverse, most notably in 1980 and 2011. This time, however, the metal pushed decisively higher, cutting through resistance levels that had capped it for generations. According to Kientz, this signals that silver is finally beginning to reflect its true role as a critical industrial input rather than merely a speculative asset.
“Silver not only blew through $50 — it obliterated it. Every technical level of resistance was destroyed.”
The reason is simple: silver has never been priced in a true free market. Its price has long been shaped by futures exchanges, leverage, and cash settlement mechanisms that allowed paper supply to overwhelm physical reality.
Gold, by contrast, began this transition earlier. Since mid-2024, gold prices have decoupled from inflation metrics, interest rates, oil prices, and even the U.S. dollar itself. This separation marks gold’s return to its historical role as money rather than a commodity measured in fiat terms.
“Gold became money again in 2024 — everything is being priced in gold now, not dollars.”
Central banks appear to agree. Global gold buying has accelerated as monetary authorities seek assets that function independently of debt-based financial systems. Under Basel III regulations, gold has regained status as a top-tier monetary reserve, reinforcing its position at the center of global finance.
While gold is being accumulated by central banks, silver faces a different pressure: scarcity. Industrial demand—from electronics and energy to medical and defense applications—has surged at the same time mine supply has lagged. Much of the world’s silver is produced as a byproduct of other mining operations, limiting how quickly supply can respond to rising demand.
“Silver is at least as important as oil to the world economy. Without it, a modern economy doesn’t function.”
These shortages are showing up most clearly in premiums. Physical silver trades significantly higher in Asian markets, particularly in Shanghai, than on Western exchanges like COMEX and LBMA. This price divergence suggests a growing lack of confidence in Western pricing mechanisms and their ability to deliver metal when demanded.
China’s tightening control over silver exports reflects a broader trend: resources are becoming strategic assets. By tightening licensing regimes and prioritizing domestic supply, China is signaling that silver will not be freely exported in the future. This mirrors its long-standing approach to gold accumulation.
“The world cannot allow silver to reach its true price point just yet — it’s too critical.”
As a result, global pricing is becoming regional. Shanghai is increasingly seen as a credible hub for price discovery, not because it is manipulation-free, but because it better reflects local supply and demand. This shift challenges decades of Western dominance over commodity pricing and points toward a multi-hub system where prices differ by geography.
Rather than a dramatic collapse, Kientz describes what is happening in Western metals markets as a “soft default.” Exchanges continue to operate, but their prices matter less as large buyers seek physical delivery elsewhere.
“It’s not that the markets shut down — it’s that their prices stop mattering.”
When contracts cannot be satisfied with metal, settlement moves to cash or alternative sourcing. Over time, this erodes trust and redirects trade flows. The implication is profound: markets that once defined global prices risk becoming irrelevant.
Despite their historical linkage, gold and silver are now diverging in function. Gold remains the ultimate store of value and monetary anchor, particularly in an era of currency debasement and digital monetary experimentation. Silver, meanwhile, is becoming indispensable as both an industrial material and a strategic resource.
“You hold gold to protect your ability to live through a currency reset. You hold silver because it’s a bet on the future of the real economy.”
Governments are beginning to recognize this distinction. Direct purchasing of mine output, stockpiling, export controls, and even legislative action are increasingly likely. For investors, this means silver’s value may be expressed less through price and more through availability.
Perhaps the most important takeaway is that dollar prices are becoming less meaningful. As the global system moves toward digital currencies and regional trade blocs, measuring wealth purely in fiat terms obscures real value.
Gold and silver have endured for thousands of years precisely because they transcend political systems and currency regimes. In the unfolding realignment of global power, they are not relics of the past—but indicators of what comes next.
In a world where resources determine influence and trust defines markets, silver and gold are once again telling the real story behind the numbers on the screen.
WATCH THE INTERVIEW
Sign up to our free monthly newsletter to recieve the latest on our interviews and articles.
By subscribing you agree to receive our newest articles and interviews and agree with our Privacy Policy.
You may unsubscribe at any time.
